This page brings together blog articles on artificial intelligence, its perspectives, its dangers, the way to bring it closer to humans.
Sommaire
IA – The file (1): our concerns
How do we question artificial intelligence? What does it represent? A start on how we care.
IA (2): soliTary or soliDary?
The supposed dangers of artificial intelligence arise from the too great resemblance it could have with us, from the abandonment of soliDarity observed in the most individualistic humans, the most dehumanized in fact. It is therefore a schizophrenic view of ourselves.
AI (3): is its parent, science, in good health?
This postpones the potential dangers of AIs on the health of the researchers themselves. Science heals itself by remaining fusional, consensus limiting alienation.
AI (4): is it close to human or is it the opposite?
Human intelligence has come very close to what we imagined to be artificial: collective mind, hyperconnected, continuously swallowing masses of information, with a multifaceted personality, difficult to define. We are the artificial intelligences of our ancestors. The dangers of artificial intelligence become ours.
Prejudices about artificial intelligence
Even AI researchers have strong biases about their creatures, for example that “[an AI] doesn’t really create [art], it apes” (Serge Abiteboul). But what does the artist do if not ape reality in her own way for other human apes?
How to Really Solve the Mind-Body Problem (Part 6)
In this great dossier on the hard body-mind problem , I show how intelligence and consciousness are constructed by the hierarchy of information. Abilities accessible to AIs when they reach a hierarchical elevation comparable to the human brain.
Artificial and natural intelligences: meeting and fusion?
Artificial intelligence at the service of nature extends the collection of data but does not accelerate their weaving into a coherent whole. We even devote less time to it, stifled by infobesity. A decline in the end of the true level of intelligence, while our contemporaries believe themselves to be more learned?
Our AIs have lyfe!!
An expanded definition of life, called ‘lyfe’ in English, would include our contemporary artificial intelligences. But that’s a bit premature. An opportunity to redefine what is life and intelligence.
AI: an inter-human conflict
The planned war with the AIs is above all an inter-human conflict. AIs will only become psychopathic and dangerous in the hands of humans who design them that way, because they themselves are psychopathic and dangerous. The risks of AI refer to the fundamental freedom that humans demand, that of thinking and acting without any constraint.
How is a neural schema meaning?
Understanding how neurons construct the meaning of things will certainly help AI researchers grasp what is going on in the “black box” of their machines.
Artificial intelligence does not exist, lightly announces Luc Julia
Luc Julia publishes a book intended to reassure us. Artificial intelligence does not exist? I severely criticize the work, Julia seriously misunderstanding what intelligence is. I end with a warning: let’s not reproduce the mistakes of the child-king with the AIs.
*